Medivent
- The system behind the catalogue, accounts and orders
- Fast cached data, and orders synced into their CRM
NestJS · PostgreSQL · Redis
Read the storyThe backend we recommend for most projects — because it stays cheap to change, easy to hand over, and ready to grow.
Your tenth feature costs like your second — not triple.
Bad data is blocked before it ever reaches your business.
Any NestJS developer can pick it up. Including yours.
More customers and features, without a rebuild.
Same technology underneath, so this is not about speed. It is about how much is decided for you — and you feel that after launch, not in month one.
| What you will hit | Plain Node.js | NestJS |
|---|---|---|
| Adding features next year | Slows down as the code grows | Costs what it did at the start |
| A new developer joins | Learns this project's own habits first | Already knows the layout |
| Bad data getting in | Checked wherever someone remembered | Blocked automatically, in one place |
| Handing the project over | Knowledge sits in someone's head | The structure is the documentation |
| Getting much bigger | Often means a rewrite | Split and scale, no rewrite |
Small and staying small — one form, one report, one job? Then this is cost with no return, and we will say so.
Our Node.js workOrders, customers, billing, logins — separate, so one change cannot break the rest.
Website, app and admin panel all read the same numbers.
Who may see or change what, enforced by the system.
Emails, invoices and syncing run in the background. Customers never wait.
Payments, CRM, messaging — each swappable without touching everything else.
Automated tests catch a new feature breaking an old one.
NestJS · PostgreSQL · Redis
Read the storyNestJS · PostgreSQL · Stripe
Read the storyThe tools we build with. Otherwise, ignore this line.
Because it decides what your second year costs. Most software spending happens after launch, and a system with no agreed structure gets more expensive to change every month.
No. The framework generates most of the repetitive setup, so version one costs about the same. The saving shows up later, in every change you ask for.
It keeps running while we rebuild one area at a time behind the same screens. Nothing goes dark, and you can stop whenever priorities change.
No. You get the code, the accounts and the documentation, and it follows conventions any NestJS developer already knows. Replacing us should be easy.
Yes. For one form, one report or one small job, this much structure is cost with no return. We build those in plain Node.js and say so upfront.
Follow the stack we would use, the work we have already shipped, or the services that pair with this one.
The stacks we reach for on this kind of engagement.
Projects where we applied this in production.
Where this technology does the work.
Tell us what you are building, in your own words. We will tell you what we would use — including when the answer is not NestJS.